-
Digital pathology Objective comparison: Olympus APO 20x NA0.75 vs 60X NA0.8
15 Oct 19Digital pathology Objective comparison: Olympus APO 20x NA0.75, 0.63 adaptor, scanning resolution 0.27um, scanning time 19 sec, Cervical Pep Smear VS PlanNC 60X NA0.8. The images from both objectives are comparable. APO 20X can seems has wider depth of filed and the color is better than 60X. However APO 20X is almost 2K USD expensive than 60X. I would prefer 60X.
Read More > -
Digital pathology Objective comparison: Olympus PlanC N 60x NA0.8, VS 40x NA0.65
15 Oct 19Digital pathology Objective comparison: Olympus PlanC N 60x NA0.8, 0.35 adaptor, scanning resolution 0.16um, scanning time 41 sec, Cervical Pep Smear. For 40x is 0,25um, 31 sec. With 60X, we can see more details of cell and it's more sharp. However, 60x has narrower depth of field compare with 40x. Sometimes we don't see the things on different level with 60x, while 40x can.
Read More > -
Digital pathology Objective comparison: Olympus PlanC N 60x NA0.8, Cervical Pep Smear
15 Oct 19Digital pathology Objective comparison: Olympus PlanC N 60x NA0.8, 0.35 adaptor, scanning resolution 0.16um, scanning time 41 sec, Cervical Pep Smear. Although the resolution is higher, the scanning time only 10 sec more than 40X from 31 sec to 41 sec. The details of cell can see much more than 40X too. So the price is not too high when scan with 60x.
Read More > -
Digital pathology Objective comparison: Olympus PlanC N NA0.65, Cervical Pep Smear
15 Oct 19Objective comparison: Olympus PlanC N NA0.65, 0.35 adaptor, scanning resolution 0.25um, scanning time 31 sec, Cervical Pep Smear
Read More >
Bionovation@hotmail.com
858-2267172
11585 Sorrento Valley Rd.
